Comments on: Should You Package Your Copywriting Services? https://filthyrichwriter.com/should-you-package-your-copywriting-services/ Tips, tools, & training for new and aspiring copywriters. Fri, 19 Apr 2024 04:46:09 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 By: Nicki Krawczyk https://filthyrichwriter.com/should-you-package-your-copywriting-services/comment-page-1/#comment-417935 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 21:55:05 +0000 http://filthyrichwriter.com/?p=5521#comment-417935 In reply to Mike.

Thanks for asking! 🙂

Nicki

]]>
By: Mike https://filthyrichwriter.com/should-you-package-your-copywriting-services/comment-page-1/#comment-417934 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:47:14 +0000 http://filthyrichwriter.com/?p=5521#comment-417934 In reply to Nicki Krawczyk.

Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for replying!

]]>
By: Nicki Krawczyk https://filthyrichwriter.com/should-you-package-your-copywriting-services/comment-page-1/#comment-417931 Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:14:36 +0000 http://filthyrichwriter.com/?p=5521#comment-417931 In reply to Mike.

Hi Mike,

Not necessarily. Listing a few common packages on your site can help to get a potential client clear on what you offer and what you may need. It’s likely that you won’t *need* to customize a package with every client; if you structure a package well, it should be useful to many potential clients. The key is that you *really* need to know what clients truly need and what will benefit them before creating a package. In addition to those packages, you can also note that custom packages are available.

Thanks for commenting!
Nicki

]]>
By: Mike https://filthyrichwriter.com/should-you-package-your-copywriting-services/comment-page-1/#comment-417910 Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:33:42 +0000 http://filthyrichwriter.com/?p=5521#comment-417910 So the best approach is to not have generic packages permanently on your website (which seems like you’re cheap to me), but rather go through the consultation process with a client first to get a good understanding of their needs. And then customize a package (if it’s appropriate) to suit, right?

]]>